Hire SaaS Developer for Recruitment Agencies
Senior, direct, no layers

A recruitment firm that has built a reliable way to source, screen and place candidates holds a method other agencies would pay to use every month. Turning that method into a subscription product means one hiring system that many agencies sign up to, each with its own clients, jobs, candidates and placements kept apart from every other agency.

The tenants here are agencies and in-house hiring teams, and candidate data makes isolation a legal and commercial duty, not a nicety. One agency's shortlists, client fees and candidate notes must never surface in another agency's search, even when both agencies chase the same candidate for different roles. Each tenant needs its own pipeline stages, client companies and permission levels for recruiters, researchers and clients.

If the firm only needs hiring software for its own desks, a single-business system is cheaper and this product machinery is waste. If it intends to sell the system to other agencies, tenancy, per-seat billing and signup an agency owner can finish without help belong in the first release. Book a free discovery call to test whether other agencies would pay a subscription for this before any build is scoped.

The build starts with the tenant boundary at candidate level, because one agency seeing another's shortlist or fees ends the product. Clients, jobs, candidates, notes and placements are modelled per tenant from the first table, and tests deliberately try to read across tenants, including through shared candidate names and client portals.

Launch is proven on a real hiring round, not a demo database. A small group of real agencies runs live jobs on subscription, from posting and sourcing through shortlist to placement, and billing, import and support are fixed from what those recruiters actually hit before the product opens wider. Code, billing setup and hosting stay in the business's own accounts.