Home About Case Studies Hire Me Contact
Currently available for select engagements

Hire Software Developer for Agriculture
Senior, direct, no layers

A software developer for agriculture: Custom software in small, tested releases, each usable on its own.

15+
Years Experience
100+
Projects Delivered
6
Countries Served
$25M+
Revenue Enabled
Agriculture — Development & Engineering

A senior software developer for agriculture

A farm runs on records that rarely sit in one place. Field notes live in a notebook or a phone, spray and fertiliser applications in another file, harvest weights at the weighbridge, and buyer settlements in email or a spreadsheet that only one person fully understands. When those records disagree, the argument is settled by memory, and the settlement, the spray history, or the stock figure is the thing that suffers.

The job here is a single farm business's own system, not a product sold to other farms and not a public website. It joins field, crop, labour, and buyer records into one set of books the farm itself owns, with the rules of the farm written into the system: which fields were sprayed and when, what withholding period applies before harvest, which grade went to which buyer, and what each load was actually paid. Staff screens are kept plain, because the people entering data are often standing in a yard, not at a desk.

That scope is deliberately narrow. A farm that needs a marketing site or a multi-tenant platform to sell to other growers needs a different engagement, and this one says so. Book a free discovery call and the fit gets tested against one real process, such as harvest intake or buyer settlement, before any wider scope is agreed.

The build, piece by piece

What a farm system actually has to hold together

  • Field and crop records that stay in one place — Planting dates, varieties, field boundaries, and input applications per field, so a spray record, a harvest load, and a buyer invoice can all be traced back to the same ground.
  • Harvest intake and grading, without retyping — Loads weighed, graded, and allocated to buyers or storage in the same pass, so the weighbridge figure, the grade sheet, and the invoice stop being three different numbers.
  • Buyer settlements that reconcile — Contract terms, deductions, and payment dates held against each delivery, so a settlement dispute can be answered from the record rather than reconstructed from memory.
  • Labour and contractor time tied to fields — Seasonal crews, contractors, and machinery hours recorded against the field or job they worked, which is what payroll and cost-per-field figures actually need.
  • Inputs, stores, and withholding rules — Chemical and fertiliser stocks, application rates, and the waiting period before a treated field can be harvested, enforced as dates in the system instead of remembered by one person.
  • Reports the farm already argues about — Cost per field, yield by variety, and buyer performance, drawn from the same records staff enter daily, so the meeting starts from agreed numbers.
How it fits farm work

Built for fields, sheds, and patchy signal

Connectivity on a farm is uneven, so the system is designed for that reality first. Entry screens work on a phone in the yard, a load can be recorded with a weak signal, and anything that fails to send is queued rather than lost. The office view and the field view show the same records, because a system with two truths is worse than the spreadsheet it replaced.

Season shapes the rollout. Nothing structural changes in the middle of harvest unless the farm asks for it, and the first working piece is usually the record that hurts most, such as intake or settlement, piloted on one field or one buyer before it spreads. The farm's own accounts hold the code, the data, and the hosting, and the records are kept in plain, exportable form so a future developer can pick the system up without reverse-engineering it.

The order of work

From first walkaround to a system the farm trusts

  1. Walk the process, field to buyer

    A visit or a detailed call follows one load from field to payment, noting every place a number is copied, guessed, or held in one person's head. That walk sets the scope.

  2. Fix the record shapes before any screens

    Fields, loads, grades, buyers, and settlements are defined with their rules, including withholding periods and deduction types, because a wrong record shape corrupts everything built on it.

  3. Ship intake or settlement first

    The most painful record goes live as a small, usable piece, tested on real loads and real settlements, and corrected while the change is still cheap.

  4. Widen only after the farm trusts it

    Further records are added one at a time, each piloted on live work, and the handover leaves documented code, data, and a plain guide to keeping it running.

Why Omer

Why hire Omer

  • Traced from field to payment: Every load, grade, and settlement links back to a field and a date, so disputes and audits start from evidence instead of recollection.
  • Designed for yard conditions: Screens and entry flows assume gloves, glare, and weak signal, because a system nobody can use in the yard will not be used at all.
  • One painful record first: The build starts where the farm loses time or money today, not with a grand system diagram that delivers nothing usable for months.
  • Rules written down, not held privately: Withholding periods, grading rules, and settlement deductions live in the system, so they survive staff changes.
  • Farm-owned from the first commit: Code, hosting, and data sit in the farm's accounts, and the records export cleanly, so the farm is never locked to one developer.
FAQ

Questions, answered

Can the system work where mobile signal is weak?
Yes, where it matters most. Field entry is built to queue when signal drops and send when it returns, so a load recorded in a remote field is not lost. Anything that genuinely needs a live connection, such as a buyer lookup, is kept in the office view rather than forced onto field screens.
What happens to our existing spreadsheets?
They are not thrown away on day one. The records they hold are mapped into the new system field by field, the old sheets are kept readable during the pilot, and the switch happens only when the new records match the old ones on real loads.
Does this replace our accounting tool?
No. The farm system holds operational records, field, load, grade, and settlement detail, and it hands summary figures to the accounting tool the farm already uses. Rebuilding bookkeeping inside a farm system would duplicate a solved problem.
Who keeps the system running after handover?
Anyone competent with standard tools, because the stack is conventional and the documentation covers the data model, the integrations, and the routine jobs. Ongoing help from the builder is available but is not a condition of the system working.
What if we only need harvest intake fixed?
Then only harvest intake gets built. A single painful process is a legitimate engagement on its own, and scoping it narrowly is usually the fastest way to learn whether a wider system is worth doing.
Currently available for select engagements

Ready to get started?

The best way to explore working together is a quick conversation. Reach out through your preferred channel and let us discuss your project.