Home About Case Studies Hire Me Contact
Currently available for select engagements

Hire Python Developer — APIs, pipelines, and automation built for real traffic

Hiring a Python developer is easy; hiring one who designs for concurrency, failure, and scale is not. I build and lead Python systems — FastAPI services, Django platforms, Celery workers, async pipelines — with the observability and testing discipline production demands. You get senior architecture, not just scripts that happen to run.

15+
Years Experience
100+
Projects Delivered
6
Countries Served
$25M+
Revenue Enabled

I'm Omer Muneer Qazi, a Dubai-based Fractional CTO & Solutions Architect with 15+ years of experience and 100+ projects delivered across 6 countries. Your build gets one accountable owner: scoped milestones, weekly demos, and reviewed code. For the Django-specific track, see hire a Django developer.

What You Get

Senior Python engineering for production systems

How It Works

From discovery to handover

A structured engagement with no surprises — you’ll always know what’s happening and what’s next.

Why Omer

Why hire Python through a Fractional CTO

Python projects usually die from invisible complexity: tangled async code, untested data pipelines, and dependency trees nobody dares upgrade. Across 100+ projects in 15+ years, I’ve learned to spot those failure modes early — and to build the testing, typing, and observability that keep Python systems boring in production.

One accountable owner, scoped milestones, and weekly demos you can verify. If that working style fits, start the conversation on my hire page. You’ll always know what’s done, what’s next, and when it ships.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What Python frameworks do you work with?

FastAPI for high-performance APIs, Django and DRF for full platforms, Flask for lightweight services, and Celery for background work — chosen by fit, not fashion, for your specific problem.

Can you rescue a struggling Python project?

Yes. I audit the codebase, tests, and infrastructure, stabilize the critical paths first, then refactor toward a sane architecture with your team in the loop throughout.

How do you handle data-heavy workloads?

With profiling first: I measure where time and memory actually go, then optimize queries, add caching or streaming, and parallelize safely — never premature optimization on guesses.

Do you write tests?

Always. Pytest suites with meaningful coverage on critical paths, plus type checking and CI gates. Untested code doesn’t ship to your production on my watch — that’s non-negotiable.

How do we start?

A discovery call to understand the problem, then a scoped proposal with milestones and timeline. Most engagements kick off within one to two weeks of that first conversation.

Under the hood

What actually changes when you hire a Python developer who ships to production

When you hire a Python developer for anything beyond a throwaway script, the first thing I do is pin the environment so the code runs identically on my machine, in CI, and in production. That means a single pyproject.toml, dependencies locked with hashes through uv or pip-tools, and a committed Python version so nobody argues about 3.11 versus 3.12. I turn on mypy in strict mode and Ruff for linting and formatting before I write a feature, because retrofitting types onto an untyped codebase is slow and expensive. Python's permissiveness is its trap: it will happily run code that is quietly wrong. My job is to make the quietly-wrong cases fail loudly, early, and in a test rather than at 2am in production.

The decision I get asked to make most often is the concurrency model, and it is the one teams most often get wrong. The GIL means threads do not speed up CPU-bound Python, so number-crunching belongs in multiprocessing, a ProcessPoolExecutor, or out in C extensions like NumPy and Polars. I/O-bound work, such as talking to databases, queues, and third-party APIs, is where asyncio earns its place, provided nothing blocking sneaks onto the event loop. The classic failure I inherit is a FastAPI service calling a synchronous driver or requests inside an async handler, serialising everything and wasting the whole model. I fix that with async drivers like asyncpg, connection pools sized to the database rather than the app, and clean boundaries between the sync and async halves of the system.

I refuse to optimise on a hunch. Before touching anything I attach py-spy to the running process or run cProfile, and for memory I use Scalene, so every change is driven by evidence rather than folklore about what should be slow. Nine times out of ten the bottleneck is not the interpreter at all; it is the database. N+1 queries from a lazy ORM, missing indexes, and connection churn dwarf any micro-optimisation of a loop. I lean on SQLAlchemy 2.0 with explicit loading strategies, read the real EXPLAIN plans, and add caching only where it demonstrably pays. When Python genuinely is the limit, I will reach for Cython, a Rust extension through PyO3, or move the hot path to a worker, but only after I have measured it.

The mistakes I fix most are mundane and costly: mutable default arguments that accumulate state between calls, bare except clauses that swallow real errors, business rules validated by hand instead of Pydantic v2 models, and requirements files with no hashes so a compromised package can slip in. I bring structured logging with correlation IDs, sensible timeouts and retries on every outbound call, and idempotency wherever work might run twice. For delivery I build slim multi-stage Docker images, run Uvicorn behind Gunicorn with a worker count tuned to the host, and wire health checks and metrics from day one. The outcome is Python you can reason about, deploy on a Friday, and hand to your own team without a three-week archaeology dig.

Who it's for

When clients hire me for this

More answers

Questions buyers ask

How do you charge for a Python engagement?

Most engagements are either a fixed-scope project with milestone payments or a day-rate retainer for ongoing work, and I tell you upfront which fits better. Short, well-defined builds suit fixed scope; discovery-heavy or evolving work suits time-and-materials so you are not paying for padding. When you hire a Python developer at senior level, you are mainly buying fewer wrong turns, so I bias toward smaller, de-risked phases rather than one large contract.

Should I use Python or something like Go or Node for my backend?

It depends on the workload, and I will give you an honest answer rather than defend Python reflexively. Python is excellent for data, ML, rapid API development, and anywhere team velocity matters; Go or Rust win for CPU-bound services that need tight latency and low memory. For most API and data products the database and architecture decide performance, not the language, so Python's ecosystem and speed of delivery usually outweigh a few milliseconds.

Can you build AI or machine-learning features, not just plain backends?

Yes. I build the production scaffolding around models: serving endpoints, batching, queuing with Celery, vector search, and LLM integrations with proper rate limiting, caching, and cost controls. I am a software engineer who ships ML into production reliably, not a researcher training novel models from scratch, and I am clear about that line. If you need the model served, monitored, and affordable to run, that is squarely my work.

Can you migrate a legacy Python 2 or old Django codebase?

Yes, and I do it incrementally rather than as a risky rewrite. I get the code onto a modern, supported Python and framework version step by step, adding tests around existing behaviour before changing it so nothing silently breaks. Version upgrades, dependency untangling, and framework migrations, Django 2 to 5 for example, are a common reason people hire a Python developer with real production scars, and I have them.

What happens when the engagement ends, will my team be stranded?

No. I write code your developers can read, document the decisions that are not obvious, and keep you involved through weekly demos rather than disappearing into a black box. Where it helps, I pair with your team and record short walkthroughs of the tricky areas. The goal is a clean handover: a running system, a green test suite, and a team that genuinely understands it.

How quickly can you start, and how do you work across time zones?

I usually begin within one to two weeks of a scoped agreement. Based in Dubai, I overlap comfortably with Europe, the UK, the Middle East, and much of Asia, and I keep sensible hours for US clients too. I work asynchronously by default, with clear written updates, a shared board, and short demos, so progress never stalls waiting on a meeting, wherever you happen to be.

Currently available for select engagements

Let’s scope your Python build

Tell me what you’re building — API, platform, or pipeline — and I’ll return a scoped plan with an honest timeline.