Home About Case Studies Hire Me Contact
Currently available for select engagements

Hire Make.com Automation Expert

Scenarios that move real work between your apps — orders, leads, invoices and follow-ups — built with error handling and a handover you can actually run.

Make.com — formerly Integromat

Automation that survives contact with real data

Most Make scenarios fail the same way: they work on the demo record and break on the tenth real one, because nobody handled duplicates, missing fields, rate limits or a third-party API returning an unexpected shape. A Make engagement starts from the workflow as it actually runs today — who touches it, where it waits, where it breaks — and only then turns it into a scenario.

I am Omer Muneer Qazi, a senior developer who builds Make automation for businesses that cannot afford silent failures. You get scenarios with routers, filters, error handlers and logging, plus a short runbook for each one: what it does, what it costs in operations, and what to check when something looks wrong.

What you get

Deliverables

  • Workflow map first — A written map of the current process before any scenario is built: triggers, systems, owners and failure points, agreed with you.
  • Production scenarios — Make scenarios with routers, filters, data stores for deduplication, and error-handling routes that notify rather than silently stop.
  • CRM and store wiring — Connections to HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Shopify, WooCommerce, Gmail, Sheets and Airtable, with field mapping documented per scenario.
  • Error handling and alerts — Error handlers, retries where the API allows them, and alerts to email or Slack when a scenario fails or a queue backs up.
  • Operations discipline — Scenario design that keeps operation counts visible and under control: aggregation, scheduling and filters before expensive modules.
  • Handover runbook — A plain-language runbook per scenario: purpose, schedule, inputs, outputs, and the three checks to run when output looks wrong.
How it works

Process

  1. Discovery call

    A free call to walk through the workflow you want automated, the systems involved, and the volume it handles.

  2. Workflow map and scope

    A fixed-scope plan naming each scenario, its trigger, its systems and its success check, approved before building.

  3. Build on a copy first

    Scenarios are built and tested against test records and edge cases — duplicates, blanks, large payloads — before touching live data.

  4. Launch and handover

    Go-live with monitoring for the first runs, then the runbook and a walkthrough so your team can maintain it.

Stack & platforms

Make, and the tools around it

Make is the orchestration layer. The work around it is what decides whether a scenario holds up: webhooks for real-time triggers, Make data stores for deduplication and state, HTTP modules for APIs without a native connector, and JSON parsing for payloads that do not arrive clean. Where Make is the wrong tool — very high volume, heavy transformation, or a need for self-hosting — I say so and point at n8n or custom code instead of forcing the fit.

Typical stacks: Shopify or WooCommerce plus a CRM plus Sheets or Airtable for reporting; Gmail or Outlook for intake; Slack for alerts; and Google Drive or Dropbox for documents. Credentials stay in Make connections with scoped permissions, and no scenario stores a password in a module field.

Why Omer

Why hire Omer

  • Senior-only execution. One senior developer builds your scenarios. No handover to a junior, no account-manager layer.
  • Failure-first design. Every scenario is built around what happens when an API fails, a field is blank, or a record arrives twice.
  • Operations-aware. Scenarios are designed to keep operation counts predictable, so automation does not become a surprise bill.
  • Documented, not mysterious. Each scenario ships with a runbook your team can follow without calling the person who built it.
  • Direct communication. Slack or WhatsApp daily, video for reviews. You talk to the person writing the scenario.
FAQ

Questions, answered

Is Make the right tool, or should we use Zapier or n8n?
It depends on volume, complexity and hosting preference. Make suits visual, branching workflows with many apps. I will recommend Zapier for simple linear Zaps and n8n where self-hosting or heavy code steps matter, and explain why.
What happens when a scenario fails?
Error handlers route failures to an alert and, where safe, a retry. You see the failure in Slack or email, with the record that caused it, instead of discovering it days later in a missing report.
Do you work with our existing Make account?
Yes. Scenarios are built in your account and your connections, so you own everything from day one.
How do you handle duplicates?
Deduplication keys in a data store, plus filters that check for an existing record before creating one. Duplicate handling is tested explicitly before launch.
Can you fix an existing scenario?
Yes. A fix starts with reading the scenario history and execution logs, then repairing the failing module and adding the error handling that was missing.
Currently available for select engagements

Ready to get started?

The best way to explore working together is a quick conversation. Reach out through your preferred channel and let us discuss your project.