Home About Case Studies Hire Me Contact
Currently available for select engagements

Hire AI Developer for Fashion Brands
Senior, direct, no layers

Hire AI Developer for Fashion Brands: demand forecasting by size curve and style, plus product search that understands fit, fabric, and occasion.

1:1
Direct Engagement
Senior
No Handoffs
Scoped
Fixed Scope First
Yours
Data & Accounts Stay Yours
Fashion Brands — AI Developer

A senior ai developer for fashion brands

A fashion brand commits its money months before it knows whether it was right. A collection is bought, cut, and shipped on the strength of a line sheet and a feeling about a colour, and the truth arrives in sell-through figures when it is too late to change anything except the discount. The brand's own history — which silhouettes sold through, which sizes ran out first, which fabrics returned most — is the only honest guide to the next buy, and it usually lives in five spreadsheets and a merchandiser's memory.

An AI developer turns that history into buying and merchandising decisions with stated uncertainty. Size-curve forecasts by silhouette and channel, sell-through prediction for a new collection based on its closest past relatives, returns analysis by garment and fabric, and wholesale order forecasting by account. Each model is built for a business where a collection cannot be reordered in a week and a wrong buy sits in a warehouse until clearance.

The fashion-specific trap is the sample problem. A model trained on sell-through that mixes full-price sales, markdown sales, and wholesale shipments as if they were the same thing will learn nonsense with great confidence. Separating those channels before modelling is the unglamorous work that makes everything else possible. Start with the collection or channel where the last buy hurt most, and the work is shaped around that brand's real sales history.

What you get

What this engagement covers for fashion brands

An AI developer adds a specific capability to something fashion brands already do: sorting, reading, searching or predicting, using models trained or tuned on the fashion brands own material. The work is scoped as one capability with a test for whether it works, not as a general promise about artificial intelligence.

  • Size-curve forecasting by silhouette — Past sell-through by size, silhouette, and channel produces size curves for the next buy, so the brand stops running out of the middle sizes while the extremes sit. Curves are reported with their uncertainty, because a size curve is a bet, and bets should be labelled as such.
  • Sell-through prediction for new collections — A new collection is matched against its closest past relatives — silhouette, fabric, price, colour story — and forecast from their sell-through, with the match shown so the merchandiser can judge whether the comparison is fair. A collection with no honest relative gets a scenario range, not a false precise forecast.
  • Returns analysis by garment and fabric — Return rates by garment, fabric, size, and channel reveal whether returns come from fit, fabric, or expectation set by the product page. The fix lands where the cause is: a size guide, a fabric choice, or a photograph, rather than a general returns policy.
  • Wholesale order forecasting by account — Account histories, by collection and season, forecast wholesale orders so production planning stops relying on the loudest account's optimism. Forecasts are shared with the uncertainty attached, because a wholesale forecast presented as certain is how overproduction happens.
  • Trend classification from own sell-through — The brand's own sell-through, not a trend report, classifies which attributes — length, colour, fabric, price — actually moved in past seasons. That keeps the next collection grounded in what the brand's customers bought, rather than what the industry says they should want.
  • Search over tech packs and production records — Tech packs, supplier notes, and past production records become searchable in plain language, so a question about a past garment's construction or supplier is answered from the brand's own records instead of from a sample room memory.
Working with fashion brands

Built for how fashion brands actually operate

Product development runs through Centric PLM or Backbone PLM, tech packs in Techpacker, 3D sampling in CLO 3D or Browzwear, wholesale in Joor or NuOrder, and direct sales in Shopify with Klaviyo for customer communication. Models read from those systems and return forecasts into the buying and merchandising tools the brand already uses, rather than demanding a new platform for a seasonal business.

Brand, customer, and supplier data stay inside the brand's own systems. Nothing is pooled across brands, supplier terms are never shared, and any customer-level analysis is aggregated before reporting so no individual shopper is singled out.

How it works

From kickoff to delivery for fashion brands

  1. Pick the buy that hurt

    We start with the collection or channel where the last buying decision cost the most — overstock, stock-out, or clearance — and define success in sell-through and margin terms the brand already tracks.

  2. Audit sales by channel, separately

    The audit pulls direct, wholesale, and markdown sales as separate histories and reports where they have been mixed. Mixed channels are unmixed before modelling, because a model trained on mixed data learns a fiction.

  3. Test on past seasons the model never saw

    Forecasts are checked against whole seasons held back from training, judged on range accuracy and on whether the size curve actually prevented stock-outs. A forecast that is precisely wrong is reported as a failure.

  4. Deliver into the buying calendar

    Forecasts and curves land where buying decisions are already made, timed to the brand's calendar, with reasons and the closest past relatives attached. Monitoring compares forecasts against actual sell-through each season, and the model is retrained or retired on that evidence.

Outcomes

What success looks like

Done well, the next buy carries size curves grounded in the brand's own sell-through, new collections get forecasts with honest relatives or honest ranges, and returns fall because the garment or page that caused them got fixed. Overproduction shrinks because wholesale forecasts stop trusting the loudest account.

The limit is channel mixing. A brand whose direct, wholesale, and markdown sales live in one undifferentiated history will get models that describe a business that does not exist. Separating those channels is often the most valuable change in the engagement, and the audit names it first.

Why Omer

Why hire Omer

  • Brand's own sell-through, not trend reports: Forecasts learn from what the brand's customers actually bought, by silhouette, size, and channel, rather than from what the industry says they should want.
  • Relatives shown, not hidden: A new collection's forecast names its closest past relatives, so a merchandiser can judge whether the comparison is fair and override it when it is not.
  • Ranges for new collections: A collection with no honest relative gets a scenario range, not a false precise number. Admitting that is the model working correctly, not failing.
  • Channels kept separate: Direct, wholesale, and markdown histories are modelled separately, so a forecast never learns a fiction from mixed data.
  • Judged on sell-through: Success is measured in sell-through, size availability, and returns after launch, tracked each season, not in accuracy figures quoted beforehand.
FAQ

Questions, answered

Do we need a large amount of data to start?
Modest history can be enough if it is separated by channel. A size-curve forecast for a silhouette with several seasons of direct sales can work well; a forecast for a brand-new silhouette cannot come from history at all and gets a scenario range instead. The audit answers this per brand, and where the data is too thin, the recommendation is better recording, not a model built on hope.
How do you test whether it actually works?
On whole seasons the model never saw, judged on range accuracy and on whether size curves prevented stock-outs, and reported by channel so a good average cannot hide failure in wholesale or direct. Any figure quoted before evaluation is a guess.
Who owns the model and the data?
The brand does: the model, the pipelines, and the documentation. Sales, customer, and supplier data remain the brand's data throughout, and nothing is reused for another brand. Supplier terms are never shared, and that boundary is agreed before work starts.
What happens when the output is wrong?
When the output is wrong, the buying team sees it against actual sell-through: a size curve that stocked out, a collection forecast that missed. Corrections feed back into retraining, and if error grows rather than shrinks, the model is retired rather than defended. That correction loop is part of the engagement.
What about the ongoing cost of running it?
Running costs are the ordinary ones: the brand's existing systems, plus model hosting and monitoring inside the brand's own accounts. The monitoring routine is priced explicitly, because an unmonitored model decays as seasons and channels change. Confirm the exact shape with a quote before work starts.
Currently available for select engagements

Ready to get started?

The best way to explore working together is a quick conversation. Reach out through your preferred channel and let us discuss your project.