Home About Case Studies Hire Me Contact
Currently available for select engagements

Hire UI/UX Designer for Diagnostic Labs
Senior, direct, no layers

Hire a UI/UX Designer for Diagnostic Labs: interfaces designed around the task, not the decoration, built around test ordering and specimen collection.

15+
Years Experience
100+
Projects Delivered
6
Countries Served
$25M+
Revenue Enabled
Diagnostic Labs — UI/UX Designer

A senior ui/ux designer for diagnostic labs

A diagnostic lab is judged on turnaround time and accuracy: samples arrive, are accessioned, analyzed, quality-checked, and reported, and every hour of delay is an hour a clinician waits for an answer. Errors in accessioning or reporting cost far more than errors anywhere else.

A UI/UX designer shapes the screens people actually use: the booking flow, the record view, the checkout, the dashboard. For diagnostic labs, that means design grounded in test ordering and specimen collection as staff and ordering clinicians and patients experience it, tested with real users before it is built.

Picture a morning batch of samples arriving at once, with several urgent orders mixed into routine work. In that situation, a flow designed around the user's actual task — with the next step obvious and errors handled gracefully — would remove the hesitation that currently stalls the whole journey. Book a free discovery call and we will test the fit on one real workflow before any wider scope is agreed.

What you get

What this engagement covers for Diagnostic Labs

  • A task map for test ordering and specimen collection showing every step a user takes today, where they hesitate, and where the design must do better.
  • Wireframes and flows for the core journeys, tested with real users before visual design begins.
  • A visual system — type, color, components — the team can reuse, so new screens stay consistent without redesigning each time.
  • High-fidelity screens for accessioning and barcode tracking with the states that matter: loading, error, empty, and success, not just the happy path.
  • Accessibility work: contrast, keyboard use, and screen-reader structure, so the product works for everyone who needs it.
  • A handover pack for developers: annotated screens, interaction notes, and the decisions behind them.
The systems Diagnostic Labs actually run

Built on your stack, not on top of it

The stack here is the lab information system (LIS), analyzer interfaces from Roche or Abbott platforms, HL7 and FHIR interfaces to ordering EMRs, and barcode specimen tracking. The gap is usually connection, not tools: work lands in one system, records live in another, and nobody has one view of where a case stands. This engagement connects that stack and standardises the routines around it.

The design work sits alongside the lab information system (LIS) and analyzer interfaces from Roche or Abbott platforms as they exist, respecting their constraints instead of designing screens the systems cannot support. Handover notes name where a design choice depends on a system behavior.

This page describes services, not medical advice. Clinical interpretation stays with qualified laboratory and clinical staff. CLIA shapes what can be automated or changed, and the work is scoped to fit it rather than work around it.

How it works

From kickoff to delivery for Diagnostic Labs

  1. Learn the task first

    The real task inside test ordering and specimen collection is studied with the people who do it, including the workarounds the current screens force on them.

  2. Map and test flows

    Flows are mapped, prototyped, and tested with real users while they are still cheap to change.

  3. Design the system

    Screens are designed as a reusable system, with edge states included from the start.

  4. Hand over and validate

    Annotated designs are handed to developers, and the built product is checked against the tested flows.

Why Omer

Why hire Omer

  • Design grounded in the real task, not trends
  • Flows tested with real users before build
  • Edge states designed, not discovered after launch
  • Accessibility treated as core, not a retrofit
  • Handover developers can actually build from
Outcomes

What changes in practice

The realistic outcome is steadier turnaround: samples tracked from arrival to report, quality control visible, and critical results reaching a clinician without delay.

Two problems deserve naming: turnaround times that slip on high-volume days and specimen errors at accessioning. Both persist when the underlying routine stays manual and nobody owns the follow-up, so each deliverable in this engagement is paired with a named owner and a visible queue, and problems surface while they are still small.

What changes is completion: more users finish the task, fewer ask for help halfway through, and the team stops fielding the same usability complaints.

Browse all hire engagements or discuss your diagnostic lab workflow directly.

FAQ

Questions, answered

Do we need research, or just nicer screens?
Research first. Nicer screens over a broken flow still lose users; the flow for test ordering and specimen collection has to be right before it is made beautiful.
Will the design work with our existing systems?
Yes — designs respect what the lab information system (LIS) can actually do, and handover notes flag any choice that depends on a system behavior.
How is success measured?
By task completion: more users finishing accessioning and barcode tracking without help, and fewer support requests about the same screens.
How do you handle patient data and lab accreditation?
Patient and result data stays inside the lab's own systems and approved tools, with access following existing permissions. Nothing is sent to a public tool or used to train a shared model, and ui/ux designer work work is designed to fit CLIA and CAP documentation expectations rather than work around them.
What would the first project be for diagnostic labs?
A sensible first project is one handoff — usually accessioning and tracking, or critical-value callbacks — with a clear measure such as fewer delayed reports in the first cycle. Starting narrow matters: one workflow done properly proves the fit before any wider scope is agreed, and the team gets documentation it can run without the builder.
Currently available for select engagements

Ready to get started?

The best way to explore working together is a quick conversation. Reach out through your preferred channel and let us discuss your project.